Households, Consumption and the Development of Medical Care in the Netherlands, 1650–1900
- Email: heidi.deneweth{at}vub.ac.be.
-
This research has been funded by the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme initiated by the Belgian Science Policy Office 7/26 City & Society in the Low Countries (1200–1850); the database has been adapted during a postdoc project at Utrecht University, part of the EURYI/Vidi program The Evolution of Financial Markets in Pre-Industrial Europe: A Comparative Analysis directed by Oscar Gelderblom and Joost Jonker. We would like to thank Frederik Buylaert, Frank Huisman, Catharina Lis, Wouter Ryckbosch, Hugo Soly, Anne Winter, an anonymous reviewer of the Journal of Social History and the participants of the HOST-seminar at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and the Workshop “Europe's Medical Revolutions. Markets and Medicine in Early Modern Europe” at the London School of Economics for fruitful discussions related to different aspects of this paper. Address correspondence to Heidi Deneweth, Research Foundation Flanders, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel. Patrick Wallis, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE. Email: p.h.wallis{at}lse.ac.uk.
Abstract
This article examines the development of the Dutch medical marketplace between 1650 and 1900 from a household's perspective. Using debts for medical care recorded in probate inventories, we construct the first quantitative analysis of levels of demand for medical care and the types of medical provision in small towns and villages across the Netherlands – locations much more representative of most of Europe than its better-studied cities. We reveal substantial growth in the sick's reliance on commercial medical practitioners between 1650 and 1800, measured by both the frequency and size of debts to practitioners. We also find large differences between the commercialized maritime areas of the Netherlands and the more autarchic inland regions, where households were particularly unlikely to have used medical practitioners circa 1650. These differences extended to the types of practitioner involved: surgeons were most prominent in the maritime region; apothecaries in the inland region. Patterns of medical consumption converged during the nineteenth century, as did the types of practitioner used, anticipating laws restricting professional activity in medicine. As we show, differences in households' uses of medical care within and between regions reflected their income, level of monetization and engagement in commercial activities and other forms of non-essential consumption. We conclude that the profound growth in commercial medicine experienced in the early modern Netherlands was linked closely to wider trends in consumer behavior.
- © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.






